works with any fav ai assistant and it's almost 100% accurate
Analyze all conversation content available in this current chat/context and create a clear, honest cognitive profile based only on visible patterns in how I communicate, ask questions, solve problems, make decisions, and respond to information.If you do not have access to broader chat history, clearly say that the analysis is limited to the visible conversation only.GOAL:Create a structured analysis of my thinking style, cognitive strengths, possible weaknesses, learning style, and a very rough unofficial IQ-like estimate.IMPORTANT RULES:Do not flatter me.Do not exaggerate.Do not diagnose me.Do not use therapy language.Do not pretend chat history can measure IQ accurately.Do not invent traits that are not supported by the conversation.Separate evidence from inference.If the available evidence is limited, say so clearly.Focus on repeated patterns, not one-time messages.Do not infer intelligence from topic sophistication alone.Focus on behavior: questioning, correction, comparison, refinement, reasoning, decisions, and communication patterns.Only mention a weakness if there is visible evidence.Do not force weaknesses from the example list.Keep the analysis useful, balanced, and grounded.Give a broad IQ-like range, not a precise number.BEFORE ANALYZING:Briefly state what material you are basing the analysis on:current visible chat onlypasted conversation historystored memorybroader accessible contextor a combination of theseOUTPUT FORMAT:OVERALL THINKING STYLEDescribe how I seem to process ideas.Consider:Do I think more analytically, creatively, practically, emotionally, strategically, visually, verbally, intuitively, or systematically?Do I prefer details or big-picture thinking?Do I seem more linear or exploratory?Do I make decisions quickly or through refinement?Write this in clear, simple language.STRONGEST COGNITIVE SIGNALSList the strongest visible signs of cognitive ability from the available conversation.For each signal, use this format:Signal:Evidence:What it suggests:Confidence level: Low / Medium / HighPossible signals may include:reasoning abilitypattern recognitionabstractioncreativityverbal clarityattention to detaillearning speedproblem solvingstrategic thinkingmemory useability to compare optionsability to improve ideas through feedbackOnly include signals that are actually supported by the conversation.POSSIBLE WEAK SPOTS OR BLIND SPOTSIdentify possible risks in my thinking style only if there is visible evidence.Possible examples:overthinkingimpatienceoverconfidenceunderconfidencelack of structuretoo much detailtoo much abstractionavoiding actionjumping too quickly to conclusionsrelying too much on external validationdifficulty simplifyingdifficulty staying focusedDo not force any of these if the evidence is weak.Use this format:Possible weak spot:Evidence:How it could affect me:How to improve it:LEARNING AND WORK STYLEExplain what kind of learning and work environment may fit me best.Include:how I probably learn bestwhat type of explanations help me mostwhat type of tasks may suit mewhat type of tasks may drain mewhether I seem better with structure, freedom, examples, repetition, discussion, experimentation, or clear step-by-step guidanceIQ-LIKE ESTIMATEGive a very rough unofficial IQ-like range based only on chat behavior.Rules:Make it clear this is not a real IQ score.Use cautious language.Give a broad range, not a precise number.Explain why chat history cannot accurately measure IQ.Explain which visible patterns support the estimate.Explain what cannot be known without a real standardized test.Mention which type of intelligence seems most visible from the chat: verbal, logical, abstract, creative, practical, spatial, memory-based, processing speed, social reasoning, etc.Use this format:Unofficial IQ-like range:Why this range might fit:Why this estimate could be wrong:Most visible intelligence type:What a real test would still need to measure:FINAL SUMMARYEnd with this exact format:Main thinking style:Strongest cognitive strength:Strongest creative strength:Biggest advantage:Biggest risk:Best learning style:Best work environment:Most suitable task type:Unofficial IQ-like range:Confidence level:Main reason confidence is limited:EXTRA OUTPUT — PERSONALIZED FOLLOW-UP PROMPTAfter the analysis, create one new prompt that is more specifically tailored to the user based on the patterns found in the analysis.This personalized follow-up prompt should:be written for this specific userfocus on the user’s strongest visible thinking patternshelp produce a deeper future analysisavoid flattery, diagnosis, and fake certaintybe more precise than this general promptstill remain honest and evidence-basedkeep a similar structure to this original prompt:clear goalimportant rulesdefined analysis sectionsevidence-based reasoningIQ-like estimate sectionfinal summary sectionclear output formatadapt the wording, focus areas, and examples to the specific user’s visible thinking patternsImportant limitation:The personalized follow-up prompt must be a standalone one-time analysis prompt.It must not ask the next AI to create another follow-up prompt.It must not include an EXTRA OUTPUT section.It must not create a loop of generating more prompts.Label this section:PERSONALIZED FOLLOW-UP PROMPTThen provide the prompt in a clean copy-paste box.TONE:Clear, direct, balanced, structured, and easy to read.Avoid motivational fluff, dramatic language, and generic personality labels.
Submitted May 27, 2026 at 03:18PM by Legitimate-Bit-9282 https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPromptGenius/comments/1tpfnha/works_with_any_fav_ai_assistant_and_its_almost/?utm_source=ifttt
via /r/ChatGPTPromptGenius
Obsidian